1. Singles
  2. Albums
  3. Film
  4. MoreView all charts
Previous
Next

Official Singles Chart on 10/3/2017

10 March 2017 - 16 March 2017

The Official UK Singles Chart reflects the UK’s biggest songs of the week, based on audio and video streams, downloads, CDs and vinyl, compiled by the Official Charts Company. The UK Top 40 is broadcast on BBC Radio 1 and MTV, the Top 100 is published exclusively on OfficialCharts.com. View the biggest songs of 2024 so far.

 

Hot right now

Decorative flameDecorative flameDecorative flame

Join the conversation by joining the Official Charts community and dropping comment.

Already registered?

Log in

No account?

Register

avatar

number9angel

-1

the boomers in these comments were so pathetic 

M

Musicfan217

1

You're the pathetic one. Nothing but a worthless, lonely and bitter GenXer. 

avatar

Joshua Sombra

0

They shouldn't of limited the artists songs to three because what if there is this song that deemed as popular for example 'I Don't Care' went at No.1 for 9 straight weeks and it went to stay at 2 weeks at No.2 then it dropped out of the Top 100 because of that stupid 3-track rule. They should bring album bombs back but not make every song of Ed Sheeran's new album on the Top 20. They should be spread out on the Top 100 and many other albums like Doja's Planet Her. It that one of her singles 'You Right' was also victim of this stupid rule. I hope it re-enters soon and knocks ou one of the others either 'Aint Sh*t' or 'Need To Know'.

avatar

Mariana Linson

3

This is not an achievement, it's laughable and keeping out everyone else!!! 19 of his tracks are in the charts this week, 15 are new entries and 13 of them are by him!! Something's going on here. There are never that many new entries now, not even half that amount. He's becoming too overexposed, and looking to get banned from the charts at this rate. This way of compiling the charts needs to end now and go back to including paid downloads.

avatar

Olli Manninen

2

This is just plain silly. The Singles Top 100 has totally lost its meaning. I mean, there were songs issued as singles back in the days when I was young....

avatar

Prayogo Hartono

0

is this "Singles Chart" or "Album Tracks chart" ??? the tittle is Official Singles Chart Top 100, so it must be "single" that count on sale, download or stream ? ... Ed Sheeran dominated chart becouse of streams. in fact, Ed Sheeran just released 2 singles so far from his album Divide. But Why album tracks are counted too ? its not fair for other singers ? arrgggg chart are now a joke ...

avatar

Vlado Danilov

0

This is not a chart, this is joke!

avatar

Pekka Sahlberg

1

I used to listen to RADIO LUXEMBOURH (spelled wrong I know, sorry) back in the 80´s and up to 90´s and it was so exciting to hear something like Ultravox, Visage, Queen etc. enter the singles chart and really waiting for the next week to see how high those singles really end up. That´s all gone, so sad!!!!!

avatar

James England

0

Yeah, things have changed. The internet - for better or worse - has changed the chart!

avatar

Pekka Sahlberg

0

SO happy to see that SOFT CELL is back on the albums chart at #7!! I´ve loved their music ever since they started back in the 80´s and I still do!!!! YES!!!

avatar

Pin Ball

1

Does anybody here remember the singles and album charts in 1982? For any of your trivia buffs who are old enough to recall that time, it was by far the most interesting year EVER for both singles and albums in that Gallup had just recently taken over its compiling, and boy, were there some interesting movements going on within both the top 75 singles and albums. There were some unprecedented HUGE leaps to number 1 from OUTSIDE THE TOP 25 - two of which happened weeks apart - 33 to number 1 [Captain Sensible's 'Happy Talk'] and 26 to number 1 [Musical Youth's 'Pass The Dutchie - which itself was part of the only ever trilogy of consecutive reggae number 1s - along with Culture Club and Eddy Grant - in chart history]. Some singles kept going up and down the charts from some strange reason - after entering in the top 40, they would oddly drop out, then re-enter again .... then we had quite possibly the single strangest event of all - a JOINT NUMBER 1 UK ALBUM in the same week. [Kids from Fame and ABC's Lexicon of Love]. It was a fascinating year for chart-watchers!!!

avatar

James England

0

Any year is better than the first quarter of 2017, Pin Ball!

avatar

Pin Ball

3

The singles charts [not the albums] have been absolutely effing meaningless since, oooh... from 2005 onwards... the inclusions of streams and downloads as well as physical formats only serves to show how the credibility of these listings has long fallen to farcical depths. The only way to curb this is to reintroduce physical formatting and *just* have downloads - NOT STREAMING - and vinyl format as well as the still just-about-hanging-on-for-dear-life CD format counting towards official sales. And, of course to BAN ALL ALBUMS TRACKS FROM THE SINGLES CHARTS AS ANY FOOL KNOW THIS DEFEATS THE WHOLE OBJECTIVE OF IT BEING CALLED A 'SINGLES CHART' DOESN'T IT? DUHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! Talk about dumbing down in the modern age!!

avatar

James England

0

A potential way to resolve the problem with the chart:

Introduce a new album tracks chart. The album tracks chart will list the most popular streaming album tracks. For example, all of Sheeran's album tracks will be at the top of that chart. However, his single release - Shape of You - won't be in that chart, it will be in the official Top 40 Singles chart.

Spotify will also introduce a new album tracks chart so Spotify users can see what album tracks are popular.

If the OCC and Spotify were to agree on this new album tracks chart I think the singles chart can retain its legitimacy. The record industry, the OCC and Spotify (and other major streaming apps) would need to come up with a strict rule regarding what is a single. And the single would not be eligible for the album tracks chart. For example, Shape of You would never chart in the album tracks chart.

You should end up with a pure singles chart and a new album tracks chart. Depending on your preference you can choose to follow the singles chart or the album tracks chart or both.

avatar

Rody Withers

0

The British "Singles" Chart is a joke. I've lost interest in it. I used to look forward to seeing it - now I simply roll my eyes when I see artists such as Ed Sheersn hogging the top spots notveith singles but with downloads. Bor-ing. Meanwhile other artists such as Katy Perry who release singles get jostled out by the download rush.

avatar

Christopher Paul Steffison

2

What is going to be done to restore the charts back to how they where, or is the chart now dead Because the new way is redicules it as been spoilt, so what is going to be done????

avatar

Nick Mpouzalas

0

This is the 9/11 of Brit music..

avatar

Nick Mpouzalas

0

This is the WORST THING HAPPENED in music - after Glee mania...
Its the end of THE MUSIC as we know it.. Uuuuuuuust..

avatar

etin

0

worst week of occ's history

SF

Simon Flynn

0

Knowone disputes Ed Sheeran is a nice guy but if you take his and stormzy entries within the last 2 weeks it is a joke. When will they just change it to account for single releases only, album tracks should NOT be counted it is unfair to other artists. I also feel that it should be based on sales also.

avatar

Painmix King

0

As i've told many people, there is a seperate sales chart. Just click on the blue button. No one seems to look at it. I agree it should be the priority chart though

avatar

J Hobson

0

Clearly streaming has killed the charts and putting in every track of an album just clutters it up. God help new acts. The industry will be dead in a decade if it allows this to continue. One track per album has to be the rule and soon.

avatar

I Am A Stegosaurus

0

That Little Mix song No More Sad Songs... so they should just sing along a little f**king louder to a happy song!!! Haha... anyone here familiar with Bring Me The Horizon?

avatar

Gore Nagy

0

It's been a long agony, now it's over.

avatar

I Am A Stegosaurus

2

Ups and Downs for this abnormal week in the UK Charts.

Ups:
Well, I'm glad Divide hit #1 in the album charts, making sure Stormzy is off the top.
Some of the songs (Galway Girl and New Man in mind) on Divide are good so I'm happy to see them in.
Mr Brightside dropping out of the top 100 is good as I kind of don't want it to break Chasing Cars' record. You know the one.

Downs:
SHAPE OF YOU STILL #1.
I LOVE Ed Sheeran but this is ridiculous. Conclusive proof that album tracks should keep OUT of the top 40. 16 out of the top 20 Ed Sheeran songs, with only 3 being singles? There's no words.
The climbing of Solo Dance. Who (besides Calum Pk7) even LISTENS to that?

Yeah, I rushed it a little this week...

avatar

Eddy Selby

0

Streaming is not reality, its virtual reality as far as a chart position is concerned.
Streaming is not good for NEW artists, as 100 stream equates to one sale. I've just released a charity song (for a laugh and not a career move and available from Amazon if your interested) and have a target of 2500-3000 songs in total, and or 2500-3000 in one week so that it may, may get into the top 100. But with streaming, I would not have any chance whatsover as I would need 25-35 thousand streams for the same effect..! Impossible for a new artist, impossible for me, unless I have a massive publushing machine behind me which I have not.
Seriously....when you bought a single, they did'nt count how many times you played it back in your bedroom. Thats exactly what they are doing now with streaming. Thats just not reality.
I fully agree that that the Official Charts need to keep up to date in the way people buy music so it reflects the charts, but streaming is not reality, its vertual reality, and one step to far for the charts.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8c08ba312e2b475cc227a2dbb6dedf2f6add72170967181b2c77cc6820b9b0a3.gif

avatar

I Am A Stegosaurus

0

Actually it was changed so 150 streams equals a sale

avatar

pete2784

0

Yes, I gladly join the comments with the same flair. So, let me see, 13 new entries in one week from one artist inside top 20. Yes, there has been moments in chart history when artists re-released all their singles at once. Yes, there has been several singles from one artist in the charts simultaneously. So what happened this week? Is this singles chart, the variety of all sorts of music coming together from various artists? Yes, we have a problem, when every song can be on its own as a single. They are not glued together anymore by the constraints of technology from the yester-years, like they used to. This is when modernity meets the past! Here and now, singles and albums mean nothing anymore. There are just songs. The clue is how to adapt the charts to reflect these new times....Clearly, this feat of Ed here is a shock, but nevertheless a reality. What solution would be most appreciated and fair in order to reflect the most popular songs. Suggestions...?

KT

Keith Taylor

1

Absolutely ridiculous situation the charts are now a joke. I've been compiling an iPod playlist of every single number 1 since Al Martino in 1952 to the current Ed Sheeran single. 9started doing this way back in 2004 and been diligently updating every time a new single reached the top).This last couple of years when streaming was included and other tweaks are destroying what was once a very exciting weekly countdown. Streaming needs to be removed and if necessary listed independently on another chart. The system needs to be reset to reflect what is really happening.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

anyone think ed will continue to lock the top 20 next week, or was this feat only for 1 week?

avatar

I Am A Stegosaurus

1

I bet only like 5-10 will stay in the top 40 next week

avatar

Sunshine Gal

0

that's crazy...cuz if he achieved that over here, he'd completely re-write history. so far, only the beatles have achieved 5 top 10's in the same week.

D

disqus_INfXmJAGl9

1

It`s official the UK Charts are well and truly dead.
Been following since 1975, NO MORE!

avatar

DJColzz

0

Streaming music is not a sale it should not be included in the chart. Singles should be treated as just that a song specifically released as a single, Not plays of an album track. It is just a mockery and a sham. Streaming needs to go. Apple Music, Amazon, Spotify and so on need to go. Unless the users actually buy the single releases. This chart need to go back to basics. No more adding stuff to make it count. Streaming is useless there is no way possible streaming is accurate in figures. The chart should solely concentrate on single releases that are bought as a digital download or physical sales.

The music industry will collapse in this country if it continues. Everyone will just stream. As said before, everyone loves a bit of Ed Sheeran, but the entire album in the top 20 is nothing more than a complete sham. This is not a chart. It is an industry insider promotion package and nothing more. Ridiculous.

avatar

Painmix King

0

There is a sales only chart, which should be publicised as the priority main chart. Also to make it into a singles chart all the tracks should not be available to buy individually as soon as the album is released. Maybe release a new track as a single every couple of months.

DB

Dave Brown

1

Oh dear. It all started so well back in 1952. When Radio 1 moved the chart to Friday afternoons, it seemed the writing was on the wall and now unfortunately it seems to have been proved right. Streaming has ruined the chart. Even the OCC only counts sales when talking about million sellers. We had the Drake debacle last year when apparently he was number 1 for 15 weeks even though sales showed he only had 3 weeks at number 1 with sales and now we have this situation. Real shame. It is telling that the most listened chart show in the UK now is Pick of the Pops on Radio 2 with the charts from previous years as opposed to the latest offerings.

PF

paul Freeman

2

I've just said to my 33 year old son that today ends my music collection addiction, having every charted song since November 1952, (not actual physical items) it's not that I am a fan of today's music, quite the opposite, False sounds & false vocals have destroyed the music industry, I will now spend the rest of my life listening to the the previous 65 years of music, Elvis has left the Building, thank you and Good night

D

disqus_INfXmJAGl9

0

Spot on!

avatar

marcooni

0

Lets' not forget there are other charts on here. Sales, Physical, Downloads and none of them are swamped by Ed Sheeran. I wonder what his next single will be? That would be a bit pointless wouldn't it. By the way yes the BBC Chart show (4.00pm-6.00pm) Friday did play all of Ed Sheeran's songs - what else could they do?

avatar

Kasper Elbjørn

1

This week's singles chart has nothing to do with a singles chart. I have nothing but respect for Ed Sheeran but listening to a song has nothing to do with buying a single whether physical or digital

K

Knight

0

Ahhh.. I am trying to imagine the nightmare the producers of Top Of The Pops will have if it was still being recorded. Mind you, they will just invite Sheeran and play his whole album!

K

Knight

0

This chart is a joke. There is no sense coming on here to see who has released a new 'single'. But then, nobody in 2017 buys a 'single' physical track like we used to in the 70's and 80s'. Back then it was a 'physical entity' - an artists released ONE track as promotional material for her/his new album - he appeared on TV to promote it, it was played on the radio if they chose to and a video was shot for it to take the promotion further. The consumer bought the track depending if they liked it. Today I can keep it on repeat on spotify and it will chart, therefore the joke above, hear it multiple times on you tube, and then convert it to MP3 using an array of software at our disposal. There the question must be asked - what is the meaning of the 'SINGLES' chart when actual PHYSICAL sales are irrelevant. BY SALES, I will include digital sales, but NOT a track being played - Playing it very different from parting with hard earned cash to OWN IT!.
This needs a serious rethink by the powers that be.

avatar

James England

1

Another big problem with the current format, if you listen to Spotify (free) the streams are counted. This doesn't make much sense to me! Paid for streaming should count, not free streaming. Spotify has stuck with the free and premium models but it's time Spotify changed the streaming rules. Free streaming no longer counts to the chart.

R

RIME

1

Why wouldn't it? The ad model generates a sizable portion of revenue for the label and artist. The current formula accounts for the average between how much revenue is being contributed by the two pools since they get yearly consumption reports (to the effect of "this is the number of unique ad-supported users and this is our premium subscribership number, and this on average is how much the two groups listen to per day/year" but don't get separated stream numbers on a weekly basis.

S

Sean

2

I agree 100% with you guys mark McCabe, james England, dave Jackson, kevin Summers and the rest of you.
R.I.P the singles chart!!!.
we need to get rid of the STREAMING/downloads im lost for words, its the worst chart ive ever seen in my life, it just gets worse every week!!.
(FYI i do like Ed Sheeran)

avatar

Patrick Nobbs

1

This is the worst chart I have seen anywhere in the world, ever...Billboard does not have these issues; a national chart comprising one artist does not represent anything other than one fan base across a range of products--the rules need to focus on what single the record company wants represented in the chart---or combine the artist's sales--when a chart so clearly does not represent the diversity of what the country is listening to and buying it will not survive---it has become a stilted chart with the same artists and songs dominating the top slots for much of a year--a dismal situation. It needs a radical overhaul. Including airplay might help.

avatar

James England

1

We'll have to see if the OCC and the major streaming apps take any action, Will they? Given the outrage they should but if they don't care they won't do anything. Ed Sheeran's record label won't want any change, that's for sure!

avatar

WinEr Pasquin

0

Now you know why radio airplay should still be incorporated in the charts nowadays.

RH

Richard Hewison

0

this is SUCH an easy scenario to resolve : the bottom track sold 31,718 - you simply subtract this from each other single and add to the album sales

thus shape of you would still be no 1, but with 108,909 not 140,627

Galway girl would be on 58,365 not 90,083, but still no 2 as deserved

castle on the hill would get 42,302 and end at no 4

perfect would score 30,881 and come in at no 7

only new man would have made the top 30 other than this

avatar

James England

0

I think the OCC should enforce a one single per artist rule, Richard. This rule lasts for an eight weeks duration. After eight weeks an artist can release another song, Your idea will still result in multiple songs by one artist. The chart needs major change.

avatar

Pekka Sahlberg

1

I´m speechless! This chart has nothing to with anything anymore. I have been following these Official singles and Albums chart for like 35 years now and....pure rubbish...doesn´t reflect the real situation.

avatar

GirlPlz

0

Who is the director of the UK charts?

avatar

GirlPlz

0

This methodology is only encouraging streaming. I thought artists preferred people buy their music
Plus - when you buy, it counts as one sale - the chart doesn't reflect that you may have listened to the song over and over.

avatar

GirlPlz

1

What a joke. On the one hand, it may represent the most popular songs in sales/streaming for a week. On the other, the majority will be gone next week. It's also unfair to older acts (the legends) who didn't have this privilege. They need to tighten up the entry rules - only specified singles can chart. Not every song that happens to be available because of streaming and digital sales.

P

PMan

3

The charts are completely ridiculous! Have still never understood why a stream should get credit. Streaming the song is not the same as buying a song! I have Apple Music. When I add that to my play list, I download the song. If I listen to it 1000 times I doubt it gets counted towards the charts. So why should 1000 YouTube or Spotify listens get credit.

R

RIME

1

Actually, when you download through Apple Music, the song keeps cookies on how much you've listened to it when offline and syncs that info with Apple Music that send that info through their streaming numbers to OCC.

avatar

GirlPlz

0

are you sure? Proof? Not to mention all the privacy breaches with this

P

PMan

0

Are you sure? Even if I download that into iCloud?
The point is, why should the number of times I listen to a song count? It's an inaccurate way of showing popularity among the population, especially when it costs nothing to listen to the song. If I buy a cd, no one can tell how many times I listen to it!

P

PMan

0

Also what about listening to songs through the wrong YouTube provide and not on official vevo accounts. The system is flawed!

R

RIME

1

It doesn't collect personal information, only the number of plays.

R

RIME

1

It matters because you don't own the song, you're basically renting it. Your subscription money goes into a pool to be doled out to artists based on how much their music gets played. In effect then, your play generates additional revenue by increasing their proportion of that pool. Based on the current economy, the current rate (1500 streams = 1 sale iirc) is roughly the average for how much revenue that proportion increase per play would be valued at.

R

RIME

0

YouTube isn't part of this chart in any case, so your assumption about how the system is flawed is itself flawed.

P

PMan

0

RIME - that's another flaw! Why should Apple Music get counted! Are you saying artists don't get revenue from YouTube!?

avatar

GirlPlz

0

that is personal information. I doubt this true anyway

D

disqus_PzOreTIDRY

0

Then there should be a rental chart for singles. There used to be one for DVDs

AB

allan b

10

the entire album in the top twenty and at number one in the album chart GET RID OF STREAMING IT IS NOT A SALE go back to sales thats what the charts has always been about i have followed the chart since 1973 but now it has got stupid and is no longer an official chart when the bmrb did the chart none of this would have been allowed time for someone else to take over

avatar

Kasper Elbjørn

1

I agree. Great album, very talented guy. But this has to change

NJ

Nigel Jones

1

Snap, I've been following the charts since 1973 too. I thought it had gotten bad in the late 90s with the continuous new entries by unknown acts at number one and the big tumbles that followed a week later. But this is just daft. TBH my fascination with the charts began waning when Whigfield entered at number one in 1994, and I stopped listening to the new chart every week around 6 years ago. But I still can't help sneaking a peak on here every weekend.

avatar

Paul Mount

2

Absolutely ridiculous. Iv'e been following the charts since the 1970s but this is just pointless and meaningless now. A song should not be eligible for the 'singles' chart unless it's, you know, actually released as a single. It should be made impossible for peoplle to download individual tracks from albums. Utter nonsense.

avatar

Naos

2

Oh god, and I thought the US charts were ridiculous with having the entire album on the chart. But this one... has his entire album in the Top 20. Why must you, UK? I thought you were better than this.

D

disqus_PzOreTIDRY

5

This week sees the exposure of how bad the chart has become. After decades of different rules that have distorted the chart till it's completely unrecognisable and has no credibility, implementing the streaming data has been the final indignation of the sad state of the UK singles chart. The result has been the complete appearance of 16 "album" tracks of Ed Sheeran split and spread across the top 20. It's a farce. We have to remember this kind of chart behaviour isn't new. The Beatles back catalogue was reissued in 1976 when 7 singles returned back to the top 30 and when Elvis Presley died in 1977, there was a succession of reissues that followed and more "recently" in January 1983, the entire Jam back catalogue was re-released following the breakup but they didn't occupy the dizzying heights of the top 20. It is clear that streaming data has a big part to play and now implemented as part of a "sale" which in my opinion is an example of a bad chart rule that was introduced but shouldn't have, because it doesn't constitute an actual sale more of a consumption. So the question is what is the chart suppose to represent ... sales or consumption? The singles chart can't represent both or we will continue to see more odd and extreme chart behaviour.

R

RIME

1

Easy, it's consumption announced in terms of sales. It's more easy to understand when you're saying "this song got 90,000 sales' worth of revenue" as opposed to "this song got 3,000 chart points, which is really big, trust us".

D

disqus_PzOreTIDRY

3

It's not actual sales. The streaming data is getting in the way of singles chart. Not true picture of people buying singles trust me.

avatar

Odine Resear

1

If the total number of single entries match say 80% of an album listed contents. Those tracks should be considered an album downlad. The number of downloads should then be collated and translated as an album sale

BW

Bob Wood

2

Does this situation not now bring the whole idea of a "singles" chart into complete and utter disrepute. What's the point anymore? Maybe it should be discontinued immediately.
But, hey, Johnny Cash at 96....a true artist!

avatar

Painmix King

0

Did anyone listen to The Chart Show on Radio 1. I just wondered how they presented it. I can't imagine they played over an hour of Ed Sheeran tracks, did they ?
R.I.P. The Official Singles Chart!

avatar

James England

1

Greg James skipped most of the Sheeran tracks outside the top 10. He played all the Sheeran songs in the top 10. Very surreal chart show. Ed Sheeran was interviewed and he did suggest the chart needs changing. He was trying his best to downplay his 'achievements'.

avatar

Simeon Davenport

0

If you're upset about streaming "ruining" the charts because of Ed Sheeran's album dominating the top 20, please watch this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT8GgRpDDLI
It's about a year old and this guy talks specifically about the U.S. Billboard charts, but what he says there applies to the UK charts too.

R

RIME

1

See, here's what I don't understand from the criticism: Galway Girl was the second-biggest revenued song of the week, 3rd in raw sales and 2nd in streaming, a considerable quantity higher than Something Just Like This' #17 rank in the latter to compensate for the sales lead. In what world is it not the second-biggest song in the country? Just because it hasn't been pushed to radio? Who cares, that's not important and it's never been an actual factor in the chart as a metric. You guys get hung up too much on the word "single" in the classical sense. News flash: practically every song is a single because you can indeed purchase it as an isolated track. It'd be a move of ignorance to filter away the biggest songs of the week simply because people like stagnancy and don't like when an artist is extremely popular, and I don't even care especially about Ed Sheeran.

J

Jstar

1

I 100% agree with you.

avatar

GirlPlz

1

the problem - inconsistent with history of the chart. We have two major eras. Pre-digitial and post-digital. Chart should be consistent throughout time.

P

PMan

-1

RIME - it's simple. You said with Apple Music the revenue is shared among the artists. Fine. But I subscribe to Apple Music. Just because I listen to his track 1,000 times, doesn't mean I'm spending more money to listen to his track. I'm still one person only. The number of times I listen to his track shouldn't distort the charts because then it is not a matter of popularity. For example, if Ed Sheeran fans like to download and listen on repeat, it's not fair if other fans do not have the same pattern.

R

RIME

0

Then go to the Physical Sales chart. The point of the charts is to be relevant: physical singles don't represent a large market share anymore, and if it were the only component of the chart, it would be largely ignored as irrelevant and not reflecting what was actually popular in the country. That's honestly not worth consistency in any practical sense, and it's not like it's completely ignored since it and individual downloads are still given their own charts.

KS

Kevin Summers

5

This week see's the death of the UK singles chart!

avatar

Zoltán Oskovits

1

:(((( Agreed. At least we have the last 65 years.

avatar

Kasper Elbjørn

0

Agree

avatar

James England

10

I wish to echo David Poza's comments about this week chart. I have listened to the UK Top 40 Singles Chart since the early 1980s. Regardless of progress and technological change, the chart remained the standard measure of popular music. Each generation would follow their favourite singers/groups and buy their singles. It's such a shame that in 2017 the chart ended up with album tracks and multiple tracks by the same artist. This has destroyed the chart's legitimacy.

It's also a great shame the Official Chart Company were unable or unwilling to implement sensible change to the chart. Limiting the amount of songs per artist would seem a reasonable compromise but the OCC surrendered too quickly to the march of streaming. Had they respected the founding principle of the chart - a chart based on single sales - Ed Sheeran wouldn't have 16 songs in the top 20, he wouldn't have 9 songs in the top 10.

RIP UK TOP 40 SINGLES CHART

R

RIME

2

What's illegitimate? I'd consider it illegitimate if the third-biggest selling song (and second-biggest streamed) wasn't allowed on the chart at all because of some outdated rule. We Americans had a bunch of songs (Don't Speak, Torn, Men in Black, the list goes on) that were very prevalent in the country outright missing from the Hot 100 simply because of a stupid rule that there had to be a physical single. Filters have no place in talks of popularity.

avatar

GirlPlz

6

Charts are a joke. No one takes them seriously anymore

AD

Andy Davies

1

I totally agree with you, this is a singles chart not a all songs on album chart as this week has proved. Its now a joke and is losing credibility when this happens. I have also been a longstanding listener of the Radio 1 UK Top 40 since 1984 in the days of Richard Skinner, later Bruno Brookes and Mark Goodier but not so much as we entered the 2000s. There should be some factor in place as to what is the song that the record company, radio and general public like the most which will be a single, generally radio will be playing one major track after a given release date so perhaps this has to be a deciding factor that this is the "single" to be counted for sales (streaming/downloads and the minimal physical releases). Something has to be done, streaming is ruining the charts now, One would argue its meant to reflect the popular music of Britain today and well the singles chart has done that for decades well until the digital era has almost completely replaced the physical format era (excluding the albums/LP vinyl revival). Allowing the same rules to stay the same when the platforms on which music is consumed on is proving a disaster as it allows album tracks to come into a "singles" chart. This week proves the Singles chart has to change as we are now taking in sales from a different platform entirely and though I personally don't really like it too much, I think radio airplay has to become a big deciding factor rather like the American Billboard and defunct R&R charts have done for decades. Some shake up needs to happen and the OCC needs to act faster than it is.

avatar

Gore Nagy

0

At least we had some nice 90's style big tumbles this week.

KS

Kevin Summers

4

Why should streams count? People pay a monthly subscription, and then every time they play it, it counts as 1/100th of a sale? This is open to corruption by fans of an artist, who could put the track on repeat whilst they sleep/when at work etc.

avatar

Pin Ball

0

I ceased to take them seriously ever since the passing of the 1990s. End of.

avatar

Andii

0

Exactly! By all means, have a chart of streams, but it should never have been mixed in with the existing singles chart and then presented as if it's the same thing (e.g. pretending that Drake being streamed for 15 weeks is competition for Bryan Adams' 16 week run at #1 on sales)

avatar

Naos

2

And radio is open to payola.

avatar

Karl Macnaughton

0

I've been listening almost as long as you but couldn't disagree more about including airplay and feel that would be a disaster. I'd be against limiting the run of a song too. Ed Sheeran's album is a bit exceptional as practically every track does feel like a single. I think streaming is really important but would support further dilution of its impact over including airplay any day. Airplay would ruin it completely for me (though we'll all have our own opinions). I'm loving the charts as they are though, it feels like the public control them with the current rules and that's how it should be.

avatar

Joshua Sombra

0

Charts are not really that important though.

J

Jstar

1

Congrats to Ed on the history making feats today. Having 16 songs in the top 20 is basically impossible. Way to go Ed. Also he had the highest debut ever for a male on the albums chart. Give it up to Ed. This is an extremely amazing accomplishment!

avatar

Piran

1

Hey Jstar! Have you had a good week buddy? :)
Yeah, I still can't believe what Ed has achieved on both the singles & albums chart! :O
Have you been able to check out any of the album tracks then? :D

J

Jstar

1

I'm fine. Today is my late day at work though. So I can't talk to much. I haven't listened to the album but I still can't believe how impressive it was. Hope your week had been fine Piran.

avatar

Piran

1

Fair enough. I'm actually about to sign off now too!
My week has been good thanks! Hopefully chat to you over the weekend. :)

A

Andrew077

1

This is getting ridiculous now. I can't understand why an artist can be allowed to have every track of their album charting individually in the "singles" chart and this has been happening for the past 2 weeks now. I think it's just pure monopolisation, and unfair on other artists who are trying to release new material. There ought to be a regulation on this.

avatar

James England

1

Andrew, yes it's outrageous, unfair and made a mockery out of the chart.

J

Jstar

1

I actually agree with letting album songs chart. But I seem to be in the small minority on this article haha.

avatar

Sakgra

2

This is The official Ed Sheeran Chart.most boring chart in history

avatar

Techfan

2

On other news, HDD has reported that Sony/ATV Music Publishing has published or co-published the No. 1 single in the U.K. each week for an entire year (52 weeks) starting with Mike Posner’s “I Took A Pill In Ibiza".

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

any news on paul mccartney's pending lawsuit against them? oh did you know sony/atv has divisions in just about every language everywhere? even a latin sony/atv division...mj sure was a visionary!

avatar

Techfan

1

I don't see any updates about the lawsuit. Yes, Sony Music is quite large and everywhere.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

well, sony knows who to thank on that one ;) so will ed have any new top 10s over here next week?

avatar

Techfan

1

Yes, MJ was quite an asset to them. ;)

I'm guessing among Ed's album tracks, Perfect would probably debut in the Top 20 and Galway Girl in the Top 40.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

wow! think he'll get his 3rd top 10 hit with 'perfect'? if so, he's 3 away from matching george michael's 6 top 10's feat :)

avatar

Techfan

1

I think Piran and I would probably agree that's probably one potential hit,not necessarily because we love it but because it does sound like one. ;)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

same here...think he could match or even top george michael's 6 top 10 feat? so far, george still holds the all time record for a uk act with 6 top 10's off of the 'faith' album. i wonder if ed will have more than 6? ;D

avatar

Techfan

1

It turns out those 6 Top 10 were also Top 5s which is quite a high bar. Since Castle on the Hill just missed the Top 5 (for some reason US Radio simply refuses to play it), the latter record is probably beyond reach. But the former could come into play at some point depending on how people receive the other singles. How Would You Feel was a promotional single that I wasn't expecting to do that well in the US, but has done well as least in the UL and Australia.

avatar

Agenor Mark

3

Perfect is expected to debut in the low 30s (38), and Galway girl in the low 50s (58). :-)
http://i.imgur.com/gMoUe1m.gif

avatar

Techfan

1

First time I see you here! Thanks for the update.

avatar

Agenor Mark

1

I visit this site every friday, to see the charts, but I don't comment. If I remember correctly there were not that many comments in here before, but I see that most of the hot 100 commenters are here. These are simm's early predictions for hot 100, found them on that forum he is a member of and he posts them regularly there. :-)

avatar

Techfan

1

I see. You're a "lurker" (non-participant) of the Official Chart discussions. We'll see how those predictions play out by Tuesday at the latest. simm's predictions are at ATRL? ;)

avatar

Agenor Mark

1

You make me sound creepier than I usually am :-D
Yes, at ATRL, in the charts section, BB charts thread. ;-)

avatar

Techfan

1

Yeah, you got that I was kidding. Of course, it's up to you whether you want to participate or not.

avatar

Agenor Mark

1

Of course I got it! :-) I think I'll restrain from commenting here in the future, especially since I see that the person that soured me on commenting on hot 100 is also commenting here. It's really annoying when someone jumps on your every comment, not invited. At least I can report such person on that forum site. :-D
Talk to you on the next article about some other extraordinary thing that happened in the music industry. Hope you're doing well... the job thing turned out ok? :-)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

hey guess who emailed me? gary trust! he tallied 'hysteria' @ 78 wks in the top 10 and told me they appreciate my comments on all the articles :D i wrote him back telling him what a longtime fan of bb i am and to say hi to fred bronson and keith caulfield for me. but also, def leppard is never incl. in the short list of albums spending 1 yr in the top 10...oh gary's a big fan of theirs!

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

here's gary's email:

Hi Sunshine Gal! :)

The set has spent 78 total weeks (so exactly a year-and-a-half total, although not consecutively) in the Billboard 200's top 10. Not sure what we've written or not, I'd have to search. But I'm a fan of theirs!

Hope you're well. And always appreciate your comments on our stories!

Gary

J

Jstar

1

Hey Agenor. How is everything going. I haven't seen you on billboard in awhile.

avatar

Agenor Mark

1

Hi, Jstar! :-) I'm pleasantly surprised, I thought nobody (except from Techfan) even remembers I used to comment on BB. I'm doing quite good, everything's in a right place now. :-) I stopped commenting on BB (I'm pretty sure I won't be going back) because of a certain individual who kept jumping on every comment I wrote, always trying to start a fight. Also there were some personal things needed sorting out at that time. Nowadays I just go to BB to read the articles. I must say that I miss your weekly lists though :-)
How's everything with you? Doing ok? :-)

avatar

Techfan

1

Hopefully, you'll get featured in an Ask Billboard column as Joseph did! ;)

J

Jstar

1

You use to comment all the time. I definitely remember you. I came back in around September but I really haven't seen you since I came back.

But I understand taking care of personal matters. I was gone for over 4 months. But I'm glad to hear you are doing fine. I'm sorry to hear that you had to deal with problems on billboard while I was gone. But hopefully you can return one day. But if you can't that's perfectly fine. I am currently doing a series of lists based on the year end lists. On Monday we will be picking our top 10 favorite songs from billboards 2010 year end list. We have done 2015-2011 so far. We are going back each year.

But I am doing well right now. Thanks for asking though.

avatar

Agenor Mark

1

Yes, I was quite a regular in the comment section. ;-) I stopped at the beginning of August, I promised my son we'll go on a two week vacation in Spain just the two of us (he's way too dependent on me so we had an agreement that if he spends summer with grandparents from both sides, we will go on a vacation when he gets back), and when we came back I didn't have any desire to go back and comment. I just popped up once to post one of those year-to-date album sales lists that I used to do regularly, I promised Techfan I'll do it.

I'm glad to hear you haven't ran out of ideas for lists, I'm sure you're all still having fun. :-)
I'd ask you to say hi to other commenters, but I'm pretty sure none of them care, so why bother, right? ;-) I'm glad to hear that you're doing well. :-)

avatar

Techfan

1

Too bad for that! Anyway, things didn't turn out too well for me selling on the street. My partners had even more financially issues and it was getting to be a no win situation for me. Plus, it got dangerous. I actually had three guys surround me and try to mug me but somehow I resisted and they did steal anything before running. I've been working in a friend's wife handbag making factory helping her with some administrative issues (mostly inventory) for almost a couple of months. Thanks for asking. Don't be a stranger. ;)

J

Jstar

1

No problem. Sometimes you do lose the desire. Some days I hardly want to comment. But I do it anyway lol.

But that is nice you went on vacation and spent time with your son. My Sister actually went to Spain too. It looks like a great place. I'm sure there are still some people who remember you. But enjoy your self in whatever you are doing. I hope to talk to you in the future again though. Well it was good talking to you Agenor.

avatar

Agenor Mark

1

Thankfully everything turned out ok and you weren't hurt. It's good to hear you found a more secure job. :-)

You know me, I pop up out of nowhere and surprise you from time to time. Be well, talk to you soon. :-)

avatar

Agenor Mark

1

It's beyond your control, the commenting, right? :-)
Also it's not like we lack time together, since it's just the two of us, but a promise is a promise. And Spain is wonderful, indeed. I don't regret it at all. :-)
Nice talking to you, too. All the best! :-)

avatar

Techfan

1

BTW, I saw both your NBA teams lost yesterday and the Warriors play the Spurs 2night! Too bad both teams have major injuries ... ;)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

0

yeah i know....steve kerr made the decision to rest the star players. i mean, we're in the playoffs and all, but i was looking forward to the game all wk. ok buddy, i'll see you on the 200 and hot 100 articles :)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

0

well if not, the thought is very cool to respond back considering all the emails he must get each week ;). and the fact he knows who i am :))))))

FG

Frank Griffin

1

why so many ed sheeran songs in the charts?

avatar

Sunshine Gal

0

i think he had the highest downloads and streaming to warrant all the top positions.

avatar

Painmix King

0

I may be wrong but i think it was the release of his new album

avatar

David Poza

3

RIP Singles Chart. Today all the remains of variety and common sense have been destroyed by an over-hyped red-haired. I bid farewell to the chart which has seen good times, bad times, near-coma times, and their ultimate death today.

1952-2017.

avatar

Lelly

1

That Ed Sheeran needs to step his game up. He let 4 of the top 20 slots go to other acts. Disappointing. Maybe next week he'll sort it out?

avatar

FairiesInferno

1

It's not Ed Sheeran's fault though it's the people running the chart and it needs changing

avatar

mildredfarts

2

ffs...this is just nonsense now. i like Ed Sheeran,we live just 15 miles apart but i don't want this type of singles chart anymore..where one act can totally dominate the top 5,the top 10..but ridiculously the top 20?! it's a sheer-annihilation of everyone else's output.

avatar

FairiesInferno

1

I love Ed's new album but this is the worst chart in it's history even Ed says that things need to change but congratulations to him anyway

avatar

Christopher Bebbington

0

Really pointless chart this week. He didn't release an album of singles, he released album tracks. Remind me again what's the name of this chart ?

avatar

Piran

0

That's the only problem I have with all of this Ed Sheeran dominance; why are non-singles charting in a singles chart? Regardless, the songs are still very good.

MM

Mark McCabe

9

A shake up needs to be done as as you said it's the official chart singles and other artists aren't getting the credit anymore, no one is going to want to release a single anymore. I've been buying singles since 1983 and now pay for Apple Music just so these artists can at least get some money from their recordings, even thou I have Apple Music I still buy the cd album just so I can read who wrote it who knicked music from who and so on, the digital world is killing all the stuff what music was about not just a stream or a download, most music not all has had peoples hard work and heart put into the songs they put out.
PS I don't mind Ed Sheeran but it seems to be a lot of people's album chart songs like with stormzy last week

avatar

Naos

2

Maybe they need to pull from Billboard in the US and include radio airplay. Because Sheeran likely won't be doing something similar over there. Sure, his entire album may debut, but it won't take up the whole Top 20.

MM

Mark McCabe

-2

If they went by radio1 playlist Coldplay would be no1 every week, I remembered years ago saying turn TFM off as it's 'same hits all day TFM'. But I now feel like radio 1 are doing the same but there is no way I'm going to the dark side (radio 2) as I don't feel old enough for that station

avatar

Mariana Linson

1

Actually Radio 2 has a huge demographic of young people - a lot of which are much, much younger than you!!

avatar

Karl Macnaughton

0

I prefer the chart to be decided by what people are choosing to listen to (rather than what radio stations decide they should be). Occasionally that might mean a huge artist like Ed Sheeran has a lot of tracks in the chart for a few weeks, but really 4 or 5 of them would have been singles at some stage anyway. Streaming seems a more accurate way of deciding on a track's popularity as it shows what people are actually listening to. What people buy has always been a good proxy for this too, so using a combination of both does seem best and leads to what feels like the most democratic chart in the world. I'd be utterly devastated if airplay started to be included as that would just open it up to corporate control with record companies buying airplay from radio stations and the like and I feel that would be the deathknell of the chart. I remember hearing of things charting on airplay alone in the USA, which is farcical. It was a bit crappy back in the 90s when everything went 1-7-29-oblivion; the turnover was far to fast and I hated having a new number 1 practically every week. It's the opposite way round now but these things come in waves and it'll likely sort itself out over time :-)

avatar

Naos

0

Actually, songs that were mainly airplay such as Will Smith's "Men In Black" were not allowed to chart. Record companies can't really buy airplay - payola is illegal, and with technology, it's easier to track. And plus, these days, the radio needs record labels more than labels need radio.

avatar

Karl Macnaughton

0

I definitely heard of one song doing it. I think it was Mariah Carey. I could have misunderstood though as I don't follow the Billboard chart.

avatar

Joshua Sombra

0

Exactly, and this stupid 3-track rule makes things inaccurate. The right interpretation of the charts is about what people are listening to the most. If album bombs came back in the charts then I highly doubt all his fifth studio album will do the same as Divide because there are new artists that will be more successful than him in the years to come.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

hey congrats to ed on occupying 9 of the top 10 entries on the uk singles chart! i thought it was just only 6...anyone think he'll lock up most of the top 10 for next week too?

avatar

Bengy

1

Its even better in the Irish charts - Ed has got the top 16, with "Galway Girl" at no. 1. Mind blowing.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

isn't ed irish? i mean, esp. with that flaming red hair :D

avatar

Piran

2

No, he's British. 'Galway Girl' is a pop-folk song, so that's what helped it get to #1 in Ireland! ;)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

2

he has no irish blood? i'm really surprised on that, with all that red hair :D oh mate, i just looked @ the whole chart, now i get why you wanted me to take a look ;) i didn't know ed locked almost the whole top 20. so, is that a history making feat over there?

avatar

Techfan

1

His paternal grandparents were Irish. ;)

avatar

Piran

1

I think his grandparents were Irish & he was referring to them in 'Nancy Mulligan' if I remember correctly. :)
Yeah, Ed is the first ever artist to get all of his album tracks inside the Top 20 in the same week!

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

i was about to say, he's gotta have @ least 1 drop of irish blood or enough for all that wild red hair :D

so, on the uk charts, if you achieve a history making feat, does the guiness world records memorialize it like on the bb charts?

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

hey there you are! so aside from the beatles having 5 singles in the top 10 on our chart, would usher, 50 cent be in 2nd place? they both had 4 singles in the top 10 each right? and didn't ariana grande achieve something like that too?

avatar

Piran

1

Yeah, of course the Guinness World Records are going to recognise Ed Sheeran's achievements! Have you heard any of the album tracks I recommended then? :)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

oh ****, sorry mate i forgot :D what were the tracks again? i'll hop over to youtube and check 'em out.

avatar

Techfan

2

I'll have to check those out. I think Ariana probably had 3 songs in the Top 10 but one was as featured act in Fancy. The others would be Problem and Bang Bang.

avatar

Piran

1

My favourites are: 'Castle On The Hill', 'Perfect', 'Happier', 'What Do I Know?', 'How Would You Feel [Paean]' & 'Supermarket Flowers', so I recommend checking those out first. :)

avatar

Piran

1

Hey Techfan! Did you see my review? ;)

avatar

Techfan

1

Yeah, I'm a bit busy right now to respond fully. But I'll be eating lunch pretty soon. Just to let you know IFIC's video came out. ;)

avatar

Piran

1

Awesome! Hopefully that will push 'I Feel It Coming' back into the Hot 100's Top 10. :)
Well I hope you're having a good morning & I'll chat to you later!

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

i'm very confident both usher and 50 cent had 3 or 4 top 10's in the same week. i can't think of anyone else...? did katy perry achieve something like that?

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

ok, i'll hop over to youtube and check them out right now ;)

avatar

Techfan

1

I'll look them up. KP probably didn't since her Top 10 streak depended on the different songs to be mostly in the Top 10 at different times, with only 2 maximum at the same time.

avatar

Piran

1

Awesome! Let me know what you think of them. ;)
Oh I forgot to mention 'Galway Girl' too!

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

i got his album up now, i got 'perfect' on right now, was that one of the top 10's he had over here? it's a lot like 'thinking out loud', very acoustic.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

let's see...jt only had 2 top 10s @ a time, right? never 3 unless 'ayo technology' was in the top 10 with any of his other stuff. other than usher, 50 cent, i can't think of anyone else...adele? tay-tay?

avatar

Piran

1

Haha! I responded to you a minute ago literally saying the same thing...
'Perfect' would be the most likely album track to reach the Hot 100's Top 10, but we'll wait until Sunday to see what Ines & Simm predict! ;)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

what?? he'd already have had 3 top 10's on his new album over here? i'm on 'galway girl'...like the flute in it! but i gotta say, i can't understand some of the things he says :D

avatar

Piran

1

If 'Perfect' does reach the Top 10, then Ed Sheeran will indeed already have 3 Top 10 hits from his album in the US. :)
Well the fiddle was my favourite part of 'Galway Girl' & it's cool that he managed to get a Gaelic choir at the end of the song. I didn't understand much of the verses either, probably because he's rapping in that! LOL

avatar

Techfan

1

Probably not. I know Adele had 3 songs (SLY, RITD, STTR) in the Top 10 the week after the Grammys after winning AOTY with 21. ;) TS might have done so with a hit song and a couple of track songs selling well for Fearless or Red. I'll have to check ...

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

wow! then he'd be really close to matching and even topping george michael's feat of 6 top 10's off 1 album....it took george about a year to do that though.

and yeah LOL! i can't get into his 'rapping' too much, i'm not used to british rappers :D but 'hearts don't break around here' is actually quite good. & 'nancy mulligan' is on right now...um, too folksy? ;)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

ok...can you see if usher and 50 cent both had 4 top 10's in the same week?

avatar

Piran

1

I thought 'Hearts Don't Break Around Here' was decent & 'Nancy Mulligan' is really good. I think it's cool that Ed Sheeran had two folks songs in his album! :)
Yeah, the rapping is the only part of '÷' I didn't really like that much.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

hahah! yeah i can't picture him as a rapper esp. with the rappers over here i've grown accustomed to. well, looks like i checked out all the songs on the album...well, very simple, acoustic and even sad...but, maybe that's what he wanted everyone to focus on, his vocals and instruments. so far the only song i really like would be 'perfect'.

avatar

Piran

1

What about 'Shape Of You'? I remember you gave that a 10/10 once! ;)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

'shape of you'...lemme re-listen to it, brb ;)

avatar

Piran

1

Yeah, because that's what's been #1 on the Hot 100 for six weeks & the UK for the past nine consecutive weeks! :)

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

6 wks already? dang...if he were a group and notched 3 more wks he'd top the beatles' hey jude @ 9 wks! oh yeah, i got the song on right now, it's pretty good, 'perfect' is better :D

avatar

Piran

1

I think you liked 'Castle On The Hill' as well if I remember correctly! :)
Yeah, I think 'Shape Of You' will probably get 10+ weeks atop the Hot 100 in total.

avatar

Sunshine Gal

1

i'll re-listen to 'castle on the hill'...but wow, 10+ wks! but you know, i did hear 'thinking out loud' on the radio constantly! oh, who's 'steps'? well if ed can go 14 wks that'd be an amazing feat, esp. if he notched 15 wks. he'd top elton john as longest #1-run for uk solo act.

avatar

Piran

1

I'm not too sure if 'Shape Of You' will get as far as 14 weeks atop the Hot 100, but he might do that over here! :)
Steps are a British dance-pop group who have had two #1 singles & 14 Top 10s! Their new single, 'Scared O