New rules to be introduced to the Official Singles Chart from July 2017

The changes are designed to ensure the chart continues to be a showcase for the new hits and talent.
ed-sheeran-stormzy-chainsmokers-official-charts.jpg

The Official Singles Chart is being updated from early July, with the introduction of new rules to help support new music and breaking artists.  

The changes are designed to ensure the chart continues to be a showcase for the new hits and talent which are the lifeblood of UK music. 

The key change will be to allow artists to have only their 3 most popular tracks (based on sales and streams) to feature in the Official Singles Chart Top 100.

The move will make it easier for new hits and artists to feature in the chart by preventing multiple tracks from popular artists dominating the singles chart. The move will minimise double-counting of album tracks between the Official Singles and Albums Charts and make the two charts more distinct. The new changes are expected to boost the number of chart hits by around 10%. 

In the past 12 months, artists including Drake, Stormzy, Kendrick Lamar, Chainsmokers, Little Mix, The Weeknd and Ed Sheeran have had multiple tracks in the Top 40. The changes will limit the domination of such artists, with streaming of tracks (as music fans listen to their favourite albums) spilling over into the singles chart.  

MORE: The Official Top 40 biggest songs of 2017 so far

The most high profile example of this came in February when all 16 tracks from Ed Sheeran’s Divide album featured in the Top 20.

An additional adjustment will see the introduction of a new streaming ratio for older tracks which are well past their peak and in steep, prolonged decline.

The aim of both changes will be to support new talent, giving new hits the freedom to progress up the chart, without being inhibited by older tracks which have passed their peak, or album tracks by big name artists. 

In recent years, streaming has grown dramatically as the consumer’s favoured way of accessing music – from around 600m audio streams a week in January 2016 to 1.2bn a week today. As a result, streaming’s share of the singles market has grown to more than 80%. 

MORE: View this week's Official Singles Chart Top 100

While this represents a revolution in choice for music fans – with 40m tracks available to stream across a wide range of services at different price points, alongside traditional music purchase – it has also changed the music landscape and the consumption reflected by the Official Singles Chart. 

The Official Singles Chart, which continues to be unveiled by Greg James on BBC Radio 1 from 4pm to 5.45pm every Friday afternoon, is the only countdown owned, run and governed by the UK music business itself. 

The rule changes being introduced have been reviewed and agreed in consultation with record labels, retailers and digital music services, across the major and independent sectors.

Look through every Official UK Number 1 single of 2017 so far:

Related artists

Join the conversation by joining the Official Charts community and dropping comment.

Already registered?

Log in

No account?

Register

*S

*5 Star

0

No artist could ever take over the US Billboard Top 10 like Ed Sheeran did in the UK because we count all metrics: Radio airplay, Streaming and Sales. Because the UK Charts fail to consider all methods of consumption including radio and are manipulating points as well, the chart is no longer representative of consumption or popularity, as it should be.

avatar

James England

0

Good move by the OCC! Nice to know they reacted to the criticism of the format. IMHO streaming isn't really 'sales' so I doubt anyone can come up with a perfect singles chart based on 88 percent streaming, but these new changes should help. And we'll never have another Ed Sheeran 'entire album' in the singles chart. Thank God for that!

avatar

The Death of Music

0

Good thing they're trying to stop the charts from being a stagnant mess. It was descending into irrelevance.

DB

Dave B

0

The charts are now totally pointless - totally manipulated to include new music. If it's selling or being streamed it's in - if it isn't it shouldn't be there.

avatar

Buddy9104

8

Sweet, now not even the UK chart isnt going to be an accurate representation of the most popular songs.

avatar

JRabbi Fernan

0

I think one of the issue here is that it is called "Official SINGLES Chart". It should be renamed as "THE OFFICIAL CHARTS" from now on. haha

Also, does the older song rule means it will also affect The Killers's oddly-popular-hit-in-the-year-2017, "Mr. Brightside"?

avatar

James England

0

Do the Killers get royalties from all the streaming of that song? Mr Brightside must have made them some extra cash. I don't get how streaming revenue works!

avatar

Anna Jaudas

0

In my opinion the UK singles charts cease to exist from July 7, 2017 on. They will be replaced by a sort of trend chart which cannot be called 'official' anymore. It's a nightmare instead! The new chart will not reflect the current commercial success of songs 1:1, especially of songs longer than 9 weeks on the charts and declining. But there is such a good solution to the problem of a boring chart. It is so not understandable the OCC does not see this solution: for every streaming account only 150 user-generated streams of a song will count for the Singles Charts. Every additional usergenerated stream will not count for the charts. All song streams which are not usergenerated must not count for the charts (e.g. listening to playlists). Quite a number of people here and elsewhere agree with me to implement this solution. It is easy, understandable for everyone and advantageous for newcomers.

S

SmartMart

-1

I am totally against this change. The irony is that the artists having multiple entries has really only become an issue since the OCC decided to include 'songs' rather than actual singles. Furthermore, the stagnation has been brought about by the inclusion of streaming and this is affecting the turnover in the charts. [So, I would suggest that, if streaming is to remain as part of the chart, the ratio is wrong.] As an example, last year there were 10 No. 1s on the 'Official Chart' (i.e. including streaming). On the Sales Chart, there were twice as many, making that chart twice as interesting. Streaming seems to be responsible for certain songs spending inordinate amounts of weeks on the chart.

Also, all these changes - past and present - create such an unlevel playing field that any chart statistics are - and have been for some time - completely irrelevant. So the latest one is that Ed Sheeran will go into the record books for his chart earlier this year and that record will remain forever unchallenged. And, as annoying as it was to have Sheeran occupy 16 of the Top 20 places, at least it was an interesting phenomenon.

I've been a chart fan for over 50 years. My interest dwindled with the inclusion of all 'songs' and dwindled further with the inclusion of streaming 3 years ago. As of July 2017, with this latest change, I'm done. It will no longer be a chart of what people are buying; it will no longer even be a chart of what people are listening to. It will be a chart based on OCC manipulation rules. Not impressed and not interested.

avatar

stumurmer

1

At least something is happening to change things up but I still believe the simplest thing would be to make it a rule that a song has to be released as a single (either physical or download) to be eligible for the chart?

avatar

Kasper Elbjørn

0

I agree you should stop messing with the charts. The Official Top 100 Singles should be the 100 most popular tracks of the last 7 days which the public have bought whther physical or digital. The problem is streaming. Stop including streaming.

C

cry

3

I think the only logic thing to do is put a streaming limit.
If you count 1000 streams as 1 copy sold when an user reaches 1.000 streams you shouldn't count his streams of that song anymore. Especially when you convert the streams into real sales for the album! If I buy an album and i listen to it 1 million times you don't count it, if someone don't buy an album but he decide to listen to it 1 million times on Spotify you count his 1 millions streams. What's the sense of all it?
And another important thing to do is: when two songs have the same number of streams but the first has more uniques listeners than the second the first one is for logic the most popular song!
If I don't know Arctic Monkeys release a new song weeks after a new Bieber's song even if the song has more unique listeners you give more points to Bieber cause his fans are teens and a unique user listen to it 20 times at day.

avatar

James England

1

cry, I think a stream limit is a good idea. Makes sense to me! I suppose if the record industry thought it was in their best interest to introduce a stream limit they'd agree to it. They must prefer the current format - although they got caught out when Ed Sheeran/Drake/Bieber etc had endless tracks in the chart.

avatar

Tigg Scholessinger

-1

Scrap the charts. they are pointless now.

avatar

mildredfarts

0

moving the goalposts yet again and too late.all the accolades/achievements like 'most weeks on chart','most weeks at number 1' 'most hits in the top 40' etc have all been askewed by different rules being introduced at various times in chart history. i'm not against these changes,i'm interested to see how they impact the look of the chart and maybe,finally,some of the lesser known acts might get their chance to shine.

avatar

Nakties Melodija

1

Streaming has heavily increased over the past few years? It's because Bieber, Sheeran and 1D fangirls learned how to manipulate the charts data since the streaming was included. And that's the biggest problem that needs to be fixed.

C

cry

0

mhh. Maybe someone did it but they are really popular and teenagers have a lot of free time. I don't think their streaming success is so "inflated". It reflect their real success in the youngest audiences.

KS

Kevin Summers

1

It's a singles chart, so just let official singles enter the chart?

R

RIME

0

Will there be a Consumption Top 100 or something like that similar to how there was a Sales Top 100 once the now-to-be-modded model was introduced? It seems a major disservice to make this chart so arbitrary, especially the formula change for losing songs, that sounds like something I'd do on a fan chart.

avatar

AcerBen

0

I think this is a good idea but just wondering will the streaming ratio even be applied to number 1 singles if they decline in sales for 3 weeks but stay at number 1? And can singles have the cap removed if they start selling on high numbers again e.g. Ariana Grande's One Last Time

avatar

Official Charts

0

yes, the three most popular songs of any artist (as dictated by sales and streaming volumes) will be eligible to chart, even if it's an "old" song. If a song has previously dropped down/out of the chart but sees a sudden surge again of 50% versus previous week, they will reset with the standard 150:1 ratio for their streams. e.g Christmas songs, old tracks performed on X Factor, songs on adverts.

avatar

AcerBen

0

Thanks for that. Is the "20 weeks/3 weeks" rule applied to all singles in the chart though? Even if a single is still at #1 but declining in sales for 3 weeks, will it have the ratio changed to 300:1 then, potentially pushing it off #1?

avatar

believe

0

Thank God!Although u should only allow OFFICIAL SINGLES on the OFFICIAL SINGLES CHART!
Why its so hard??!

avatar

Mark Willmott

0

I don't understand why all songs can't have the same streaming rules

P

PS

4

What a ridiculous implementation. So the UK charts will no longer be a true representation of the most popular songs but a list of selected tunes as curated by you? Yes, when Ed Sheeran took over the chart with his entire album, it was annoying... but at least it was an accurate reflection of the most popular tracks in the land at that point! And changing the ratio from 150 to 300 for the streaming of 'older' tracks is fair how? The changes are completely misguided and fail to address what the chart was originally created to demonstrate. Massive failure by the OCC.

avatar

James England

0

PS, Ed Sheeran's album dominance in the chart wasn't an accurate reflection of sales, just distorted streaming. It may sound a bit melodramatic but the singles chart ended in 2014. We're all kidding ourselves the singles chart is still in rude health. 12 percent of chart music is actual singles!

avatar

Andii

0

This is like fixing a leaky pipe by sticking a bucket under it to catch the drips. Try actually solving the problem itself by taking this fake stream-sale equivalence out of the main chart; they are fundamentally different.

avatar

Rob Parkinson

0

It's a tough one but to be fair I've not purchased a single in over 3 years since streaming came into play. I started with Spotify but moved to Deezer 3 years ago and I used to be a massive single buyer, I don't need to purchase singles now, in the 90s I bought single cds for £3.99 for one! How lucky now I can pay a tenner and listen to any single I so choose. It's a shame that currently people just listen to the same stuff over and over which has caused this in the charts. Also should ed sheeran be stripped of his accolade of all his hits in the top 20 from 1 album as nobody will ever be able to achieve that again now?

avatar

bwrdd

0

@certain commenters, sales and streams CAN mix together on a chart. look at billboard. look at tracklisten. look at SNEP. these are just three of many national charts that include sales and streaming. and they're not changing their rules at all.

the issue here is that the OCC still hasn't added video streams to their charts. had they added video streams the first time they added streams to the chart, we wouldn't have to worry about things like Drake's More Life and Stormzy's Gang Signs and Prayer (ie their songs debuting all over the place on the chart). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

maybe they should actually add airplay as well. just put it at a low %, though.

avatar

Rob Parkinson

0

Not airplay why should djs, radio executives etc choose which songs should be successful? Should be purely based on what people want to listen to. There is so much great music out there by amazing artists but people fail to listen as they dont know the artists name and won't spend a few minutes listening to a song they have never heard or recognise.

avatar

bwrdd

0

I mean, about airplay, that's literally the only last resort for the OCC if they're seriously this anti-streaming. they only have so many paths to take. they should just add video streams and call it a day.

and besides I don't think payola is even much of a thing anymore. here in the US, our charts have airplay, and it's fine. we're not having weeks like what Ed did with "Divide".

avatar

braindeadpj

0

You can't compare with Billboard since that uses radio airplay as well. They will probably wait and see what happens with this chart before they decide what to do.

avatar

Bengy

1

Bring back a singles chart based purely on sales. Remove the streams to a separate streams/airplay chart. Don't try to mix the two!

avatar

simon_g42

0

Unfortunately this is what happens when you try and combine two different things - sales and streaming - in one chart. You need frequent tweaks to the rules to try to iron out problems.

It seems to me that the biggest problem is that streams of a whole album count towards both the singles and albums charts. I find it hard to believe that it is not possible to devise a method of excluding streams of a whole album (or most of an album) from the singles chart. The method won't be perfect, but it should make it more difficult for the chart to be dominated by songs from one album. On the other hand, if that is what people are buying (rather than streaming), shouldn't the singles chart reflect that?

I don't like the three song limit at all. If sales between the third and fourth most popular tracks are close, this could lead to songs dropping out from a high position one week and then returning the following week.

avatar

simon_g42

0

As an additional point, the three song limit will also prevent a flood of songs by a single artist after they have died. That seems ridiculous. How about adding an extra condition so that a song in the top 100 sales chart is NOT excluded from the overall chart?

avatar

SBKP 0507

0

Or...? Just make it so only singles can get on the charts? Problem solved? We're never going to get the next amazing artist if their only allowed THREE songs on the charts because no one can highlight their dominance. Wrong decision which I hope will be changed in the near future

LM

Lee Moore

1

So a song could have its steaming ratio dramatically reduced while still at number one if it's sales have declined for a few weeks?!

avatar

Paul Anthony Searle

2

If you went back to a sales only situation based on physical and downloads only there would be no need for these addittional changes. The whole OCC charts are the laughing stock of the World. Change after change after change. Let's go back to how the charts used to always be - a system that was simple and easy to understand. These proposed changes come way too late and just add more confusion.

avatar

Official Charts

1

Hi Paul, physical singles and downloads make up just 12% of the singles market today. Streaming was added to the mix in 2014 to ensure the chart continues to do its job in measuring the singles market. Charts are, and have always been a living breathing thing that evolve in line with the evolution of the market, from vinyl to cassette, CDs, downloads and streaming.

avatar

Andii

1

So have a streaming chart. No-one is saying don't have a streaming chart. The fault is when you try to create some crazy equivalence between buying a record and playing it (which is essentially what "streaming" is, nothing new)

H

HLG

5

A better option is to only allow OFFICIAL SINGLES on the OFFICIAL SINGLES CHART! Stop allowing album tracks to feature on a chart that wasn't made for that purpose. I mean, the clue is in the title of your own chart!

avatar

Kasper Elbjørn

0

Ridiculous. You are minipulating the charts. Include only sales whether digital or physical

avatar

stumurmer

0

Completely agree! They could have a separate non singles chart if they wanted.

H

HLG

1

Yep. UK Singles Chart reverts to what it always has been, the Top 100 songs officially designated as singles by an artists record label. UK Hot 40/100 is a new chart that includes album tracks. It's that simple

S

SmartMart

0

I agree with the others here. Simply remove songs that are not singles! It's meant to be a 'Singles' chart not a 'Songs' chart. Also, the same songs are making the Official Chart (incl. Streaming) and the Sales Only Chart but the chart with Streaming is the one that's getting clogged up!

avatar

Anna Jaudas

0

your answer is not accurate. the market share of song downloads differs starkly in respect to the chart position. the overall market share is totally unimportant. But of course the decline of the download market is a problem. Cutting prices for song downloads as sharply as you cut the audiostreaming ratio for 'older songs' in your new chart would be a smart and realistic solution. Raise demand by price cuts! that's market economy... But the record companys want to gain streaming revenue...

avatar

James England

0

HLG, if the trend continues there won't be any physical or digital download sales in the next decade! It may come to a point when all singles are streaming. The OCC guy said 12 percent of singles are downloaded or physically bought - that's a tiny amount compared to streaming. It may be for the best if the entire singles chart is based on streaming. You can't halt progress. Having said that, if the entire top 40/100 were based on streaming 'sales/free streams' you could argue the chart should be rebranded as the The Official UK Streaming Top 40/100. Perhaps that will happen.

H

HLG

0

I'm not saying to eliminate streams from the chart though. I agree with streaming, it's the future, what I am saying isn't anything to do with streaming.

It's that the official SINGLES chart should not be the home of album tracks. It should be the home of SINGLES. Be that streamed, physical or downloaded, just not album tracks

avatar

AncientKing

2

In my humble opinion, only official single releases should count towards the chart, not album tracks. After all, this is a SINGLES chart, right? The new rules are interesting, and I'm curious to see how the chart will look like, under the new methodology. I think, it's a step in the right direction. I still remember the complaints when Ed Sheeran had 16 songs in the Top 20. It's a brave new world for the OCC. Bravo!

avatar

stumurmer

0

Spot on!

avatar

I Am A Stegosaurus

1

Yes thank you OC. You have finally woken up. Don't like the 'older song streaming ratio' thing as much.

avatar

Guillaume Vieira

10

Manipulation at its best. If the point is to create a chart with fake information, here some more suggestions for you:
- debuting artists will have a 1:20 ratio for their streams with their breakthrough song
- artists who already bagged #1s in their careers will have a 1:500 ratio for streams
- after 2 weeks at #1, streams will be exclude from the song, if it remains #1, after 2 more weeks its sales will be excluded too
- artists under 18 years old will have their sales multiplied by 2
- artists who never made the top 10 will have one 'bonus option' that when triggered will multiply its charts units by 3
- Christmas songs that aren't on their first year will have their streams counted as 1:1000
- Posthumous songs will be excluded from chart to make sure new hits stay visible when a legend passes away
- April 1st chart will be entirely elected by the OCC independently of sales and streams occurring that week

It will be in-line with your current changes and make sure to maintain the attractiveness of your website.

avatar

I Am A Stegosaurus

0

I strongly disagree with the under 18 one. I mean, who wants Jacob Sartorious in the charts?

avatar

Guillaume Vieira

4

All those suggestions were obviously ironical to highlight the absurdity of the chart manipulation created by the OCC with those new rules.

avatar

Andii

0

Yes, this is parody in fine form.

avatar

I Am A Stegosaurus

0

Sorry I'm dumb AF

avatar

stumurmer

0

Brilliant lol :)

avatar

Zoltán Oskovits

1

Wow, this is interesting! Where can I read about the changes (streaming ratio etc.) in more detail?

avatar

Official Charts

-1

Hi Zoltan, we'll be posting the new chart rules with all the detail on the site very soon.

avatar

Zoltán Oskovits

0

Thanks. Can't wait! :)

avatar

candog75

0

As far as I understand them a track has to have been in the charts over 10 weeks and have had 3 weeks worth of decline - then the streaming ratio is amended from 150:1 to 300:1