1. Singles
  2. Albums
  3. Film
  4. MoreView all charts
Previous
Next

Official Albums Chart on 4/11/2022

4 November 2022 - 10 November 2022

The UK's Top 100 biggest artist albums of the week, compiled by the Official Charts Company based on sales of CDs, downloads, vinyl, audio streams and video streams. View the biggest albums of 2023.

Hot right now

Decorative flameDecorative flameDecorative flame

Join the conversation by joining the Official Charts community and dropping comment.

Already registered?

Log in

No account?

Register

avatar

Fab_io77

2

The new roxette’s album its amazing!!!

A

addickted2hcharlton

4

So appy to see Madge back in again, well done Madge keep the phobes on ere at bay. I'm goin to buy the CD today n all. Thass wot I think n all Dave agree with every word of your post, love the Beatles n all n I aint from Liverpool, mind you I do like Sonia. I've always ad a bit of a soft spot for Blue, well Lee Ryan supports our gaff. So welcome back Blue @ 22, less ope you get a good run on ere n all. Shame the anti semite is still on ere, dissgrace.

avatar

thierry henon

3

Was hoping for BLUE to make the Top 10 this week as it did mid week!! Only at number 22...can't believe it...HEART and SOUL is their best album since GUILTY!!

avatar

Damián

1

Absolutely agree Thierry, the lads are back in top form. After so many yrs away the biz, a 22 position is not bad, but I'd love they had a top ten debut

avatar

Marko

-5

Who the still buys The Beatles albums?
Their music is old and trash.
Blue have the best album this week

avatar

thierry henon

-2

Couldn't have said it any better Mark! THE BEATLES are so overrated and just just bad!! I agree with you about BLUE...

PR

Paul Read

2

Can't help noticing a distinct theme to your comments on here: "Trash" "Rubbish" "Garbage" etc etc etc, all very indicative ... methinks perhaps you should get out more.

PR

Paul Read

2

Who buys Beatles? Probably just the odd few hundred million fans who don't happen to agree with your opinion.

A

addickted2hcharlton

2

Thass juss wot I think n all.

avatar

GagasPancakeT!ts

4

That Jake troll must be fuming about Madonna returning to the charts again. lol

avatar

Graham Bruines

3

Once again the OCC have no idea of chart history, Monster Mash, Ghostbusters, Thriller all have had longer chart runs & higher peaks than shown, whats the point of showing chart history when they cant get it right !!

PYG

pipis y gañas

1

Impossible FLOP leaves the top 100 after only one week and since it is considered a different album from the flop Kylie Minogue 97 album , none of them will ever reach silver status any time soon lmaooooooo. Finally enough love, on the other hand, re enters the top 100 this week.

avatar

GagasPancakeT!ts

0

Screaming at this. I didn't even notice it had fallen out of the chart completely

PYG

pipis y gañas

2

once a flop Bjork knock off album ALWAYS a flop Bjork try hard knock off album

avatar

Damián

1

It was a limited edition on vynil only you retarded, there's no more copies to buy, it was sold out from its released

PYG

pipis y gañas

1

still a flop, people could stream it but oh yeah, that album is pretty forgotten

avatar

Mathew Northcote

-1

Only vinyls are taken in as sales and nothing else.

avatar

GagasPancakeT!ts

1

What do you mean "there's no more copies to buy"? I've just checked Amazon and they're still selling it. In fact, it's been discounted to £24.41.

avatar

Damián

0

The album is a masterpiece, whether you like it or not

avatar

Damián

0

So, go ahead and buy it, you won't regret it

PYG

pipis y gañas

0

you because you say so? NME called it a trashy Bjork rip off lmao and it sold next to nothing

avatar

Mathew Northcote

-2

Sounds nothing like Bjork's music.

avatar

Mathew Northcote

-1

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/937490e9a7c6847dfb3362bf4e2b5ea45e85f0397c6157d0e4ef726c94fdafaf.jpg Madonna discounted also it must have reached about 28,000 copies now lol.

avatar

GagasPancakeT!ts

1

Discounted 3 months later as opposed to Kylie's measly two weeks on the chart. Disco was also thrown in the bargain bins a couple of weeks later too. lol

avatar

Mathew Northcote

-1

Yes but you think Madonna's so big would they be so discounted after 7 wks if she was so big as you say because two weeks ago they were discounted. Kylie's was only available on vinyl and that's all that counted and Madonna's on various editions and Disco wasn't discounted after 7 weeks. Kylie's last two studio albums have sold double the amount Madonna's last two studio albums sold in the UK. I know Kylie isn't famous everywhere it seems that you don't with Madonna. Madame X has only sold 62,000 copies and last one 28,000 so far.

avatar

Bengy

6

Can you display the proper album cover for Revolver?
And combine the 1966 and 1987 chart runs?

avatar

Sean O'Kane

2

Bit embarrassing that they use the Russian pirate version of the album. This is the *official* UK chart!!!!

PR

Paul Read

1

Less embarrassing, more indicative of their incompetence! They're also showing it as a Re-Entry but ignoring that it spent 7 weeks at #1

avatar

Blank

0

They shouldn't combine 66 and 87. The 87 reissue was on CD and given a deliberately separate chart run in it's own right since new. It's a different release.

avatar

Bengy

1

I disagree.
Its the same recordings - it does not matter whether it is vinyl, CD, digital download or streaming. All other artists are treated with combined chart runs.

avatar

Blank

0

I've been through every chart position on this site. That's not true. Many artists and chart runs are combined, many are not. Sometimes it's correct, sometimes not (i.e. there are times when the chart run belongs separate i and is correclty separated, other times when the run belongs together and is kept so, and situations where it is incorrect by being organised as the opposing scenario). For example, many of the recent(-ish) Rhino re-issues are combined on the end of the original run, even when there is another re-issue in between. All 3 should be separate issues. The distiction was much clearer in the print-era. This online era is riddled with errors, many originated by the OCC. Some have been there for decades and provably so with my old Guinness books.

It's not the same recordings that keep it in the same chart record, nor even the format but the 'issue'. As such, the 1987 issue was duly given an entry in it's own right, separate from the original. Similar examples include Elvis' GI Blues (1961 Original RD27192, reissued as SF5078 in 1975 - charted 1977) correctly separated, David Bowie Aladdin (1973 original RS1001, 1983 reissue INTS5067) incorrectly combined.